Saturday, January 30, 2010

HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT: Human Rights watch

January 2010  

Bangladesh 

Bangladesh returned to democratic rule in 2009. Constitutionally guaranteed rights, suspended during most of 2007 and 2008, were in place and the elected government under Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina made strong commitments to address a number of serious human rights problems. Yet extrajudicial executions, custodial torture, and impunity for members of the security forces continue. Following a bloody rebellion within the Bangladesh Rifles (BDR), thousands of guards were arrested, many tortured, and some killed in detention.

Political Developments

In January 2009 the military-backed interim government that ruled Bangladesh under a state of emergency during 2007-08 stepped down following parliamentary elections. An Awami League-led alliance won 263 of the 300 contested seats in parliament. Domestic and international election observers generally considered the elections to be more free and fair than previous elections. The new government has recommended the withdrawal of many of the corruption cases initiated against Awami League supporters charged in connection with the interim government’s anti-corruption drive on the grounds that the cases were politically motivated. The similar legal processes initiated against members of the political opposition are, with few exceptions, continuing. The government moved toward implementing the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) Peace Accord signed between the government and the United People’s Party of the Chittagong Hill Tracts in 1997. As part of this process the government removed some of its army troops in the area in 2009. In July parliament adopted a new Human Rights Commission Act, under which an independent commission is mandated to investigate violations. At this writing the commission has yet to be constituted. Elements in the Bangladesh Rifles, the country’s border guard unit, staged a rebellion at BDR headquarters in Dhaka, the capital, on February 25-26, 2009. In the rebellion 74 people, including 57 commanding officers seconded from the army, were killed. Despite pressure from the armed forces to place those suspected of involvement in the rebellion before a court martial, the government decided in accordance with a recommendation of the Supreme Court to try them in civilian courts and under the BDR ordinance. As of September 2009 about 3,700 border guards were detained as a result of the indiscriminate arrests that followed the rebellion. 

Extrajudicial Killings 

On several occasions during 2009 the government promised that it would end the grave problem of extrajudicial executions by members of the security forces. Yet the Rapid Action Battalion (RAB)—an elite paramilitary law enforcement agency—and the police continued to kill people in what the authorities refer to as “crossfire” killings, “encounters,” and “shootouts” but in fact constitute thinly disguised extrajudicial executions. According to the human rights group Odhikar, 109 such killings were reported in the press between January 1 and October 31, 2009. The killings increased significantly during the second half of the year, suggesting a lack of commitment to confront the security forces once the government settled into office. Alleged members of outlawed left-wing political parties are particularly targeted. In echoes of previous governments’ statements that had been heavily criticized by the Awami League while in opposition, the government claimed that law enforcement agencies were only exercising their right to self defense. On May 27, RAB killed two Dhaka polytechnic students, Mohammad Ali Jinnah and Mohsin Sheikh, in what RAB referred to as a “shootout.” However, witnesses stated that the two men were arrested at night at their campus. Jinnah’s family has filed a murder case against 10 RAB officers questioning how the victims, while allegedly running to escape, were shot in the chest, abdomen, and throat. 

Torture 

Torture continues to be used by law enforcement officials to force confessions in criminal investigations and to extort money. The bodies of those who are killed by RAB and the police regularly have physical marks and injuries indicating that they were subjected to torture. Several persons taken into custody following the BDR rebellion in February 2009 died under suspicious circumstances. Many detainees were subjected to physical torture, including beatings and electric shocks. Relatives of Mobarak Hossain, one of the BDR members who died after being detained, allege that he was tortured to death. Sources at the Dhaka Medical College morgue told the media and human rights workers that Hossain’s wrists, arms, knees, and shoulders were swollen and badly bruised. In May the government announced that a commission had been established to investigate the deaths of BDR members in custody. The findings of the commission, which was to have submitted its report within 15 days, have not been made public at this writing. On October 22, F.M. Masum, a journalist at the New Age newspaper, was detained by RAB officers and tortured. Masum has written several reports about the paramilitary unit for New Age, including on its involvement in extrajudicial killings. Laws that facilitate torture by removing or undermining fundamental safeguards against arbitrary arrests and detention remain in effect, including the Special Powers Act and the newly adopted Anti-Terrorism Act.

Impunity 

In 2009 Human Rights Watch could identify no cases of members of the security forces being convicted and imprisoned for killings, acts of torture, or illegal detentions. The government removed from their positions a few individuals responsible for human rights abuses committed by the Directorate General of Forces Intelligence (Bangladesh’s most important military intelligence agency) during the former interim government’s anti-corruption campaign. Legal provisions that have traditionally shielded members of the security forces and other public officials from prosecution, by requiring government approval for criminal actions to be initiated, remain in effect. The government is moving toward bringing to trial those responsible for international crimes in connection with the war of 1971. Parliament in 2009 passed amendments to the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act of 1973, but the law still falls short of international standards.

Freedom of Expression and Information 

Despite the election of a new government, few journalists feel that they are able to write freely about the involvement of members of the armed forces in human rights abuses, corruption, and other illegal practices. There is no indication that the government is working to implement the Awami League’s election promise of bringing to justice those responsible for past killings of journalists. Several reporters scrutinizing the affairs of politicians and alleged criminals were physically attacked. On April 11, 2009, journalist Abdullah Al-Amin Biplob of the Samakal newspaper was severely beaten by a group of men identifying themselves as supporters of an Awami League member of parliament. Earlier the same day the parliamentarian had, according to Biplob, threatened to give him “a lesson” if he continued to write articles criticizing him. A right to information ordinance adopted under the former interim government was turned into law in 2009, providing the right for people to access most kinds of government-held information. 

Women’s and Girls’ Rights

While women occupy several key positions in the government, discrimination against women is common in both the public and private spheres. Bangladesh’s reservations against the requirement in the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women to ensure equal rights for women and men remain in effect. Domestic violence is a daily reality for many women, and long-awaited laws on domestic violence and sexual harassment were still pending in 2009. The Acid Survivors Foundation reported 90 acid attacks, primarily against women, between January and September, but only eight convictions. There were reports of village elders and clerics issuing fatwas that resulted in women being caned for adultery or for talking to non-Muslim men. 

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity 
Section 377 of Bangladesh’s criminal code, an inheritance of British colonial rule, punishes consensual homosexual conduct with up to life imprisonment. 

Human Rights Defenders 

The NGO Affairs Bureau, which approves projects and funding of NGOs, created obstacles for some organizations trying to obtain permission to receive foreign donor funding. In August 2009 the Bureau cancelled an ongoing anti-torture project implemented by Odhikar on the grounds that the Ministry of Home Affairs objected to it. 

Staff members of several human rights organizations were subjected to harassment by members of the security forces. Advocate Shahanur Islam Saikot of the Bangladesh Institute of Human Rights, who filed several cases against members of the army, RAB, and police for torture, received several death threats from individuals identifying themselves as belonging to these agencies. 

Key International Actors Foreign governments including the United States and the European Union raised concerns about extrajudicial executions and other abuses, and continued to stress the importance of addressing the impunity problem. They also provided financial support to a range of human rights groups in Bangladesh. In the hope of future cooperation with RAB on organized crime, Islamic militancy, and terrorism, the United Kingdom and United States continued to conduct human rights training for selected RAB members. In 2009 Bangladesh was reelected to the United Nations Human Rights Council. However, the government has issued no standing invitation to the Council’s special procedures to visit Bangladesh. In spite of their poor human rights record, Bangladesh’s armed forces and police continue to be major contributors to UN peacekeeping operations

ORDER BY NHRC: Regarding to the case of Adv. Rabindra Ghosh.

National human Rights Commission has issued an order on January 20, 2010 regarding the case of harassment of Adv. Rabindra Ghosh.  The order stated that the allegation received from the Global Human Rights Defence and Bangladesh Institute of Human Rights (BIHR) has been reviewed hereby and the commission thinks that it should be investigated by an Additional Inspector General of Police (Ad. IGP). It also requested to Inspector General of Police (IGP), Bangladesh to submit report by February 28, 2010 regarding the action taken by IGP.


Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Urgent Action: Order by National Human Rights Commission regarding to case arbitrary arrest, maltreatment and harassment of Mr. Shahanur Islam, Executive Director, BIHR by Policemen.











National Human Rights Commission of Bangladesh has taken the allegation regarding to case arbitrary arrest, maltreatment and harassment of Mr. Shahanur Islam, Executive Director,  BIHR  by Policemen as cognizance and today issues an order to commissioner of Dhaka Metropolitan Police (DMP) to take proper action by impartial investigation by February 22, 2010.

Here specially mention that  Mr. Islam was arbitrary arrested, iltreated and harassed Tafizul Islam ( Police) along with other seven to eight policemen under ramna police station, DPM on December 23, 2010. After the incident of violtion Bangladesh Institute of Human Rights issue Urgent action to the Ministry of Home Affairs, Chief Justice of Bangladesh Supreme Court, Chairman of National Human Rights Commission, Inspector General of Police, Police Commissioner of DMP on December 27, 2010 requesting to take prompt action against the alleged perpetrators. Please Visit the link to see the application details: http://bihr-bihr.blogspot.com/2009/12/urgent-action-human-rights-defender_4939.html, http://bihr-bihr.blogspot.com/2009/12/urgent-action-human-rights-defender_477.html, http://bihr-bihr.blogspot.com/2009/12/urgent-action-human-rights-defender_6679.html, http://bihr-bihr.blogspot.com/2009/12/urgent-action-human-rights-defender_2113.html, http://bihr-bihr.blogspot.com/2009/12/urgent-action-human-rights-defender_6196.html, http://bihr-bihr.blogspot.com/2009/12/urgent-actionhuman-rights-defender.html

Friday, January 8, 2010

URGENT APPEAL: Take control of the camp Ashraf before the residents are transferred to an EU country


Hon. Ban Ki-moon
Secretary-General
United Nations

Dear Secretary-General,

Camp Ashraf in Iraq is residence to 3,400 members of the People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI) who have built it during the last 23 years.  Following occupation of Iraq, in 2004, the residents of Ashraf were recognized as 'protected persons' under the Fourth Geneva Convention. The deadly attacks on defenseless Ashraf residents in July 2009 - carried out by the Iraqi forces - have made the situation in Ashraf into an international humanitarian issue.

The U.S.A. handed over the protection and control of the camp to the Iraqi forces at the beginning of 2009. However, the Government of Iraq, contrary to the guarantees it had given for respecting the rights of camp's residents, through a Committee at the Iraqi prime minister's office, expeditiously imposed a complete siege on Ashraf.

The Committee has forbidden the entry of human rights monitoring delegations, lawyers of the residents, and even residents’ relatives to Ashraf. The Committee has seriously limited or suppressed the residents' access to medicine, doctors and medical necessities. It has forbidden the entry of fuel for civilian use for many months. In order to incapacitate and crush the moral of the residents, the Iraqi government does not allow residents to sell their handicrafts or industrial productions for their daily income. The committee has practically turned the Camp into a prison for its inhabitants.

The policy of suppression and exerting pressure on the residents, which has been repeatedly demanded by the Iranian government, turned violent.  Concurrent with the suppression of the opposition and the Iranian people seeking freedom and a democratic change during nationwide demonstrations inside Iran, on 28-29July 2009, the Iraqi army and police forces brutally attacked the unarmed civilian residents of Ashraf.  During these unprovoked attacks against the camp, 11 residents were killed, more than 500 wounded, and 36 residents were arbitrarily arrested. According to independent reports, the Iraqi forces immediately placed these 36 residents under torture.

The following day, the Iranian authorities fervently welcomed this humanitarian catastrophe at the camp. For example, in a state-run TV program, Iranian regime parliament speaker Ali Larijani, expressed hope that the Iraqi government would not allow the residents to remain in Iraq. He added, "we welcome the move (raiding the camp) although it was late."

In addition to the deadly attacks and inhumane pressures on Ashraf - all in flagrant violation of Iraq's international obligations - the Iraqi government is trying to illegally displace Ashraf residents and send them to exile to remote deserts in southern Iraq. “Prime Minister Maliki wore to expel PMOI members…” He wrote, “Relocating them to Noqreh Salman is a first step for their final expulsion from Iraq” (Reuters, December 9, 2009). Noqreh Salman is a deserted location in southern Iraq and has been known as the most notorious prison and exile point for political prisoners with inhumane living conditions.

Unfortunately, the Iraqi government has acted in complete disregard for continuous protests of thousands of European and American lawmakers and international and humanitarian organizations. A year-long experience has shown that the Iraqi government not only has no intention of protecting defenseless Ashraf residents, but it has placed them under complete siege and has conducted attacks against them.

Therefore, in order to save the lives of Ashraf residents whose annihilation has become the mandate of the Iranian regime more than ever due to escalating uprisings for freedom inside Iran, the following articles should be immediately pursued by the monitoring organs of Camp Ashraf – the U.S. and the UN - to prevent another humanitarian catastrophe:

1.                  The United Nations should undertake the responsibility to protect Ashraf residents because the Iraqi government has proven during last year that it has neither the intention nor the ability or the competence to protect Ashraf residents.

2.                  Until UN forces assume responsibility for protection of Ashraf residents, U.S. forces in Iraq should guarantee that residents would not be subject to attack, brutality and forced displacement

3.                  Until Ashraf residents are transferred to a member state of EU or the U.S., the Iraqi government should officially admit to the rights of Ashraf residents according to the resolution adopted by the European Parliament on April 24, 2009, on Ashraf.


Sincerely,
Adv. Shahanur Islam Saikot
Executive Director
Bangladesh Institute of Human Rights (BIHR)
27, Bijoy Nagar, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh

Copies to:


Ms. Navi Pillay
High Commissioner for Human Rights

Ambassador Christopher R. Hill

Gen. Raymond T. Odierno, Commanding General, USF-I


Mr. Ad Melkert, Special Representative of Secretary-General  for Iraq

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

URGENT APPEAL: Take action - or I will

To  Kevin Rudd, Barack Obama, José Manuel Barroso, Brian Mikkelsen
Subject  Take action - or I will

Barack Obama, President of the United States
Kevin Rudd, Prime Minister of Australia
José Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission

CC: Brian Mikkelsen, Danish Minister of Justice

Faced with the unique opportunity to stop climate change in Copenhagen, world leaders offered instead an historic failure.  In sharp contrast, we and the world's environment, hunger, and justice groups are mobilizing the largest movement civil society has ever witnessed, to demand a fair, ambitious, legally binding climate treaty.

I stand in solidarity with those who have taken non-violent direct action or committed peaceful acts of civil disobedience to demand climate justice. That includes the four Greenpeace activists who were detained without trial in Denmark for holding up banners at a head of state dinner. I have contributed to their action by supporting Greenpeace -- financially, morally, or in my day to day life.  If the response of governments to the threat of climate change is going to be preventive detention of those likely to support or commit acts of civil disobedience, count me among the 15 million people you may need to round up.

I urge you to recognise that civil disobedience to demand action against so grave a threat is an act of community service.

Yours faithfully,

Adv. Shahanur Islam Saikot
Executive Director
Bangladesh Institute of Human Rights (BIHR)
27, Bijoynagar, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh
eMaili: saikotbihr@gmail.combihr@bangla.net
www.bihr-bihr.blogspot.com